Translate

Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Areva financial problems. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Areva financial problems. Afficher tous les articles

mardi 1 mars 2016

French nuclear sector: caught between Charybdis and Scilla



les Échos- AFP

Areva's financial statements release: progress in view?


Véronique le Billion in "Les Echos" on February, 28th

In 2015, the group recorded a €2 billion net loss. Its perspectives remain quite blurred
The Finnish EPR in construction can been seen as a « white elephant » in Areva’s financial statements. Friday, the group released a fifth year of loss, whereas it  postponed the publication of its 2015 financial statements by a day, in order to conclude its financing for this year.
Last year, this loss amounted to €2,04 billion, among which €905 million were dedicated to new provisions on « OL 3 ». This means a global loss on the Finnish project amounting to €5,5 billion. The commissioning date is still fixed for late 2018. These provisions include for the first time a figure reflecting the progress made in the discussions with TVO, the Finnish client, « in order to settle the basis for the successful completion of the works and the settlement of the dispute », explained Philippe Knoche, Areva’s CEO.  Indeed, both parties consider the other as responsible for the 10-year delay of the construction, Areva-Siemens claiming €3,52 billion from TVO, and TVO replies by claiming €2,6 billion. Now looking for an amiable settlement of the dispute, « both parties consider to have reached significant progress », said the group in a press release. Discussions are only « a kind of prerequisite », said Philippe Knoche, still cautious.
« A Finnish-special environment »
The provisions on OL 3 include some operational overcosts on the construction site, together with « an increase of the costs and risks on the test phases » of the reactor, which have just begun and which have taken into account « the return of experiment made during the first trials of Taishan » (the first EPR in trial phase in China) and from the « Finnish-special environment », a kind of implicit reference to the difficult relations with Stuk, the Finnish safety authority.
Beyond 2015 net loss, which takes into account the costs of the present unemployment scheme, the turnover of the « new Areva », centered on the fuel cycle (mining, converting, enriching, retreating used fuels…) increased by 1.9% at constant scope of consolidation and exchange rates, namely €4,2 billion. The turnover of the transferred activities (namely the Areva NP division,  but also including the activity of  Areva TA : research and defence reactors, Canberra, the subsidiary of measures, the renewables…) is set at €4,01 billion (-8,4%), with new provisions relating to wind and solar agreements.
No turnover forecasts
As the group fights hard for its restructuration, the risk may come from the under-development of its markets, which suffer from an atone demand and overcapacities. Areva has thus given only an objective, namely a level of net cash flow of €-2 and €-1,5 billion. « Because of our present position, we focus on the management of the net cash flow of the activities, and we postpone other directions », justified Stéphane Lhopiteau, Areva financial manager.
Areva has not recorded a turnover forecast this year, nor for the following ones. « In the coming months, we will communicate about our perspectives », promised Philippe Knoche. Even if the book order of the new Areva has recorded an amount equivalent to seven years of turnover (namely €29 billion), it consumes itself quicker than it’s renewed : the amount decreased by 9,7% last year ; in mining particularly « we don’t intend to take as many orders as sales, because of the present price », indicated Philippe Knoche. Nevertheless, the group has revealed that long term agreements were signed with EDF in February, for used fuel retreatment and for uranium conversion and enrichment, for some billions of euros.
For now, Areva’s priorities will consist in notifying its recapitalisation to the European Commission, although its indebtedness has increased by €6,3 billion (+€0,5) and in « progressing » on OL 3 project and on transferring Areva NP to EDF. Then, the group will be able to come back to investors which have expressed their interest in entering in Areva’s capital, like CNNC, from China, or investors from Japan.


Lemonde.fr

Constructive talks between Areva and TVO on OL 3

Véronique Le Billion, "Les Échos", February, 19th

According to several sources, Areva and TVO, its Finnish client, are discussing « in an open way »
On January, 20th, Emmanuel Macron, France Economy Minister, said he gave a one-month deadline to Areva and TVO, its Finnish client, in order « to find a possible settlement » for the dispute opposing both companies about the construction of an EPR reactor on the Olkiluoto site, in Finland. A month later, nothing has been yet settled but, according to several sources, discussions are progressing positively. « Each partner intends to settle the dispute and all discussions are made in a positive environment », said a source close to the case. « Discussions are intense. TVO intends to find a solution », adds another source. In Helsinki, at TVO headquarters, no comment is made nonetheless.
Settling the case « OL3 » is of significative importance for the restructuration of the French nuclear sector, which has been in fact necessary because of the quasi bankrupcy of Areva. Indeed, TVO has been awarded a control right on any possible direction change in Areva boarding council, according to the clauses of the turnkey agreement signed in late 2003. But EDF, which is on the verge to buy Areva NP, namely the reactor division, which manages this OL3 agreement, does not want to take responsibility of the project. For some good reasons : the construction has faced a 10 years delay and Areva has already recorded an €4,6 billion of provisions for foreseeable losses on the project.
Seeking a global agreement
In order to boost the restructuration in view, Paris has suggested transferring the OL3 agreement to Areva SA, the holding of the equipment manufacturer. But TVO rejected this option, fearing that the transfer of the  ownership of the agreement to Areva NP  would hinder the access to the related human and financial resources needed for the construction completion. « Splitting up the agreement from the resources is a significant matter of concern.  Completing quickly OL3 should be the main objective of the restructuration of the nuclear sector presently expected in France », explained Lauri Virkkunen, TVO’s CEO, in « les Échos » recently. It seems that discussions help to understand better the expectations of both parties, as this program (OL3 completion) has been still in the core of the incoming measures, which would appoint EDF as Areva’s contractor. The announce of a €5 billion recapitalisation of Areva SA also improves relations between parties. Indeed TVO has no interest in weakening further the image of the French nuclear sector.
The second thorny issue of the case consists in the international arbitration still pending between Areva and TVO, the first, allied with Siemens as partner, claiming €3,52 billion to the Finnish, and in return the Finnish claiming the amount of €2,6 billion from Areva. « Areva is working to find a global agreement with TVO », said a source close to the case.
Presently, it’s not at all sure that discussions will close the subject before Areva’s financial statements release, on February 25th. According to our information, the group shall record some €300 or 400 million of additional provisions on OL3 project accounting for the past fiscal year, which would increase its net loss from €1 billion to €1,5 billion.

The major refit of nuclear power plants arises the concern of the Court of Auditors

Anne Feitz, "Les Échos", February 10th

Wise Men are concerned with the recruiting and training costs arising from EDF investment program and from uncertainties because of the energy transition law.
Highlighting investments in heavy maintenance and in renovation of the nuclear park which shall be supported by the power operator by 2030, this program is of major concern for them, particularly from two points : needs of recruiting and training by 2020, and uncertainties arising from the energy transition law, particularly from the official target intending to reduce the nuclear part in the national energy mix, so that nuclear power would reach 50% of the total (conversely to the present 70%).
In 2011, EDF launched its project « main refit », not only to meet the new safety rules elaborated after Fukushima accident, but also to lengthen the lifespan of its 58 reactors in function, from fourty years to sixty. The power operator has recorded an amount of €55 billion for this program over the 2014-2025 period, and the Court of Auditors has agreed on this amount.
Insufficient involvement of the State
Nevertheless, the Court has highlighted a longer period, namely from 2014 to 2030, where the expenses will reach some €100 billion (€75 billion of investments and €25 billion of operations). The Court considers that these investments won’t impact significantly power price, compared with today’s tariffs. But the Court observes that this price has  increased between 2010 and 2013, namely from €49,6 to €59,8 per megawatthour (euro/MWh), to reach a peak at €62,6 per MWh in 2014, « because of the sharp increase of maintenance investments ».
Wise men observe that EDF projects in the nuclear sector, this program included as well as new nuclear power plants in France and abroad, shall need 110,000 new positions by 2020, either direct or undirect positions, among which 70,000 will need the professional A-level to the master level. Although two third of the companies of the sector face difficulties to recruit staff in some specialties, like piping/welding, fittings, or technical consulting.
« EDF has also highlighted a lack of executive resources, whereas training for such positions is quite long », they wrote. They insist in implementing trainings and promoting such trainings, and they regret the present wait-and-see attitude of the State. « The mobilisation of actors is not corresponding to the challenges in course in the field of recruitment and training. The State faces difficulties in implementing the right measures, particularly in the field of training ».
Shut down of some 17 to 20 reactors
The second concern of the Court of Auditors applies to the target, written in the law, to reduce the nuclear part to 50% of the electric mix by 2025. « If power consumption and exports stay at their present level by 2025, this target would entail a reduction by a third of the nuclear production, namely the equivalent of 17 to 20 reactors », wrote the authors of the report, hammering in black and white the main stance hold by various experts, since months.
No valuation has been made about the impact of this law, but this regulation will convey consequences on EDF assets : the loss of yearly revenus will amount to €5,7 billion, the decrease of operational expenses will reach some €3,9 billion, the reduction of maintenance investment will account for €1,5 billion… without taking into account the loss of capital gain on the operator’s asset or the impact on employment.
The Court insists on the need to implement such a valuation, in the framework of the energy comprehensive multi-year program, which shall set the role of the different energy sources, and due to be released in « April or May 2016 ». It is not sure whether such wish will be raised as the Energy Minister, Ségolène Royal, indicated that the program shall integrate « a set of hypotheses, which will lead to different results… »




dimanche 17 mai 2015

Areva starts the most important restructuring of its corporate history.


Areva and labour costs: improving the financial position

VERONIQUE LE BILLON / ON MAY 5TH, LES ÉCHOS




 The nuclear group, facing important losses, announced its targets to staff representatives on Thursday. - AFP PHOTO / CHARLY TRIBALLEAU



Areva has started negotiations in order to reduce its world position number by 6,000 on a three-years’ time, namely 14% of labour force.

That’s only a start. On Thursday, Philippe Knoche, the group managing director, announced a target set at a 15% reduction of labour costs in France and another 18% in the world by 2017 to the trade unions representatives . As such, this target will amount to 3,000 or 4,000 job cuts in France within a three years time’s, which, at the world scale, would amount to 5,000-6,000 jobs cuts, the highest this figure be, the best. This will amount to a 14% cut in world labour force for the public nuclear company, which counted around 44,000 positions in late 2014 (among which 28,500 are located in France).
The direction spoke to the staff representatives straightforwardly : labour costs amounted to €3,3 billion (€2,4 billion in France), whereas its revenues amounted to €8,3 billion last year (falling by 8%). This situation has become unbearable because of the heavy loss suffered by the group last year (namely €4,8 billion, among which €2,6 billion of operational loss).

Different means will be used during the negotiation of a « transition agreement », whose discussions shall start tomorrow and last until next month. Indeed the group expects to negotiate with the trade unions an early retirement plan for the staff, whose age is close to retirement age, which is the case for 2,800 workers aged more than 57 years. Moreover, a voluntary early departure programme will be launched, dedicated to support functions, among which « the group has opened many positions », according to the HR manager, during the 2000s – and these positions amount to 4,100 jobs in France. Particularly, the number of hierarchic levels shall be reduced.

In its foreign subsidiaries, Areva has already announced 1,500 job cuts in Germany and launched a voluntary departure plan together with redundancies in the United States. « In France, there won’t be any redundancy and all production sites shall be protected », said the Economy Minister to AFP. He will convene the trade unions on May, 22nd. Volunteers to departure shall meet several conditions and work in the targeted plants. Nevertheless, "the management is aware that these measures won’t be enough and expects some « suggested » mobilities, and even forecasts redundancies », indicated FO (left-wing trade union) in a press release on Thursday yet.




Overhauling

In order to reach the targeted €600 million of expense cuts by 2017, Areva intends to modify some personnel agreements and to revise its staff’s total remuneration. Incentive agreements shall be reviewed drastically, following their expiry date. « It’s impossible to share what one does not own », says François Nogué. Although the financial statements have been in red since 2011, the group shall pay some 7 to 8% of profit-sharing for 2014. According to an incentive scale, profit-sharing for 2014 amounts to €2,000 to €6,000 per worker, with a company additional funding of €800, but that shall be also modified, as the present 40 agreements will be set into a global settlement for all the company.
Moreover, working time will be also revised. Following the company from which the staff comes (former Cogema or former Framatome), executives, who are working according a fixed-day basis, work some 202 and 218 days yearly (218 days being the threshold set by the collective agreement).« That’s a shock for workers who felt protected and taking profit of a quasi-public status. The most difficult thing facing the group shall be how to convince the 85% of the remaining staff whereas there is no corporate project », observes a former worker.
Sub-contractors won’t escape this complete overhauling : as the group intends to reach the € billion of expenditure cuts by 2017, Areva expects to reduce its external expenditures by €340 million.

http://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/energie-environnement/02154531581-areva-veut-reduire-ses-frais-de-personnel-de-15-en-france-dici-a-2017-1117434.php
http://www.areva.com/EN/news-10522/areva-launches-negotiations-with-labor-organizations-on-social-component-of-competitiveness-plan.html
http://www.usinenouvelle.com/editorial/rien-ne-va-plus-chez-areva.N315659

Read also in this blog:
http://energygeopole.blogspot.com/2015/04/areva-reviews-forging-inspections.html
http://energygeopole.blogspot.com/2015/03/todays-article-will-deal-with-arevas.html
http://energygeopole.blogspot.com/2015/02/edf-and-areva-face-over-cost-in-nuclear.html

lundi 16 mars 2015

Today's article will deal with Areva's present crisis although the company is a world champion.
Here are the views of Anne Lauvergeon, former CEO of Areva:


Anne Lauvergeon and Areva's present crisis


Anne Lauvergeon, about Areva’s crisis: “I have got my share of responsibility”

Les Échos
VERONIQUE LE BILLON / DEPUTY HEAD OF DIVISION AND DAVID BARROUX/ EDITORIALIST/ ON MARCH. 13TH

After Areva’s sky-rocketing losses, Anne Lauvergeon criticizes some kind of “untruth”. She highlights the State’s obligations, then Fukushima consequences and unveils details about the mining division.

Last year, Areva recorded nearly a €5 billion loss. In what way are you responsible of this?
Four years ago, I left Areva after two mandates. As everyone, I was surprised and shocked, mainly because all financial analysts following Areva were recommending it as an investment, before November 2014 profit warning. Having spent ten years at the head of a group, I have compulsorily a share of responsibility and I am still linked to this company and to its staff. But I can’t bear anymore the kind of untruth, which are leaking here and there.

Areva : History

Nevertheless, Areva’s history is the same as yours?
In 2001, Areva was registered, following the common political expectations of a right-wing president and a left-wing government, including environmentalists. The public authorities were aware that it was high time to stop the dissentions between Cogema and Framatome and that it was time to integrate these companies. This model has been deemed relevant, as Rosatom, in Russia, has subscribed to the same strategy. The president and the government agreed on the fact that a €3 billion increase in capital was necessary to redeploy Areva’s industrial capabilities, which dated back from the seventies. But I regret that the increase in capital has been postponed many times. Only in 2010 the group was able to rise €910 million. It should have been enough. But there were two upheavals. First an energy crisis happened in Europe, whose consequences are as follows: Alstom was compelled to sell its energy division to General Electric, GDF Suez recorded some €15 billion depreciations in 2013 and the German operators were doing badly. Then Fukushima changed the nuclear landscape.

But Fukushima did not weaken all the nuclear operators to such this extent…
The other operators of this field are either conglomerates working in many fields like General Electric, Hitachi or Mitsubishi, or companies associated with a central state, like in China or in Russia. In the view to reduce Areva’s sensitivity in case of a nuclear accident, we diversified its activities. But the State requested to sell a third of our turnover by transferring Areva T&D in 2010 (activity of power distribution). Refocusing Areva on nuclear was a political decision.

Le Monde.fr
Thus, the blame is on the State acting as a shareholder?
The State played its part well in the Supervisory Board I knew. Nevertheless, the State took time to award Areva the necessary means to face international competition.

The Financial Authority has criticized the conditions of the Finland EPR, OL3. And all major projects come from….
The spokesman criticized many points! The Finland EPR will cost three times its initial price. Like this one built by EDF in Flamanville. Construction costs have increased everywhere in the world, because of the rise of steel and concrete price. Many major and complex projects costs have soared sharply, for instance in aeronautics with the A380 or the B777-X, as well as have done the major architectural projects: The Paris Philharmonie budget has tripled. In Finland, we have sent our best elements, like Philippe Knoche, who has been responsible for the construction. We have got a client who has refused any “change order”. An arbitration case is pending.

Lepoint.fr

But the EPR is considered as your creation?
The EPR was born in 1991, ten years before my arrival (at the head of Areva), coming from a German-French political and industrial will, involving Framatome and Siemens, then the power operators and the safety agencies. The European customers wanted this huge third generation reactor. I arrived in a company where the EPR was already designed.  Then, the Atmea reactor is my creation: that’s a 1,000 Megawatt reactor, designed jointly with Mitsubishi. In 2012, Turkey bought four reactors, such heralding the first significant order registered after Fukushima.

Lefigaro.fr
A preliminary investigation has been launched about Uramin’s acquisition conditions. Do you acknowledge a kind of strategic mistake?
In 2007, we owned several mines in Canada close to their end of life, then there were some geopolitical risks in Niger and finally, we faced a buoyant demand from our customers, mainly from China. We implemented an organic growth in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. But it was not enough. Everybody buying raw materials in the first semester of 2007 paid more than in 2009: nobody forecast the subprime crisis. After Fukushima, 10% of the world demand disappeared, which justified the mothballing of some mining projects and as such, the recording of some depreciations – I would have done the same. There is uranium in Uramin. Even there are 9,000 tons more than previously expected. Look at Areva’s reference documents published these last three years: you will find the amounts of the first two deposits. About the South African deposit: it was sold for the pathetic amount of USD5 million to Australia’s Peninsula in late 2013, who has found since then 25,000 tons of uranium, featuring operating costs lower than the present spot market price.
Shall Areva be divided?
Aggregating, dividing then aggregating: business bankers are fond of this. But today, Framatome would be dead if the company were left alone: Framatome did not get the means to finance alone the opening costs of the third generation, and facing world competition, it has been able to take profit of the profitability given by Cogema in the fuel cycle. The best solution would be a joint work between EDF, GDF Suez and Areva. Today, all conditions seem advocating this solution.
The nuclear “business model” is not yet dead, so?
No, the nuclear sector is not yet dead. This topic will be discussed during the COP 21 conference in Paris. I used to say that nuclear power is not the ultimate solution, but there is no solution without the nuclear sector. Moreover, let’s stop the “French bashing”. We can scratch the sores until the end of times, but Areva is still a world champion. But now the new nuclear sector mainly needs state financing. Our main competitors have got such financing, on the contrary of Areva. That’s a major challenge for France and all infrastructure industries. 
Véronique Le Billon, Les Echos
David Barroux, Les Echos


Going further...


Read more in this blog: